Gaetano Checinski

Looks like MSVC does not support Higher order (lambda) functions with auto properly. However we can return lambdas from template functions and lambda template variables: https://godbolt.org/z/MG74eo

although this is possible: ```c++ vector >> drop(n) >> take(m); ``` Given that this is an random access container I'd suggest implementing an slice / advance operator that is random-access...

I hope this is helpful: [Here](https://github.com/buckaroo-pm) is a list of [Buckaroo](https://github.com/loopperfect/buckaroo)'s officially supported libraries and then there is more on our [wishlist](https://github.com/LoopPerfect/buckaroo-wishlist/issues).

That looks like a great solution! However I wonder if we can use some type provider magic to generate the right types to make this not necessary

@odinthenerd good point. We probably need to align to the next power of two. Would be nice if someone could write a testcase for ARM as it does not support...

@jcelerier could we use `std::allign` and `std::alligment_of` to accomplish proper alignment? Do you know in which cases the alignment needs to be adjusted?

Thanks for your efforts! > Are my changes with static_asserts working in your setup? The `enable_if` vs `static_assert` is always an interesting discussion. Although `static_assert` is easier to read and...

handled via https://github.com/sebmarkbage/art/pull/19

as far i can see, the code segment you are referring at, gets called by fs.watch. but new require calls call extension_js directly and may throw [here](https://github.com/rlidwka/node-hotswap/blob/c1ef053a6d2a9c6793c0095902467bc88a31d5d0/hotswap.js#L214-L221) This can happen...

Let me refine my question: First, let's walk through the process of creating a coverage report for a simple `foo.cpp` and `test.cpp`: ## Steps 1a) `g++ -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage -c foo.cpp...