Nigel Stewart

Looks good.

Coud well be that a majority here are already widely boost-entangled. So it isn't high on our priority list, but by the sound of it, would not be a complicated...

[boost::json](https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_82_0/libs/json/doc/html/index.html) perhaps?

Same problem here.

Is there enough interest in this to propose it as a GSOC '24 project? I know we'd use JSON Schema validation in C++, if it was available via boost. They're...

Indeed. I don't really have a sense if such a thing should be part of boost::json, or an optional layer on top of it.

@fsmoke I'm a bit sympathetic that precompiled headers are indeed a bit of paradigm for Windows, but not so much of a thing on other platforms. We're cross platform Windows...

I've been broadly interested in using `std::optional` as an alternative to throw-happy paths such as boost::json::object::at. I have two suggestions to add here. 1. In addition to pointer-returning _if_contains_, an...

There is a call for GSOC '24 mentors on the boost mailing list. If this sort of "C++17 enrichment" project for boost::json is of interest to the maintainers, I'd be...

While I'm here rambling about `std::optional` I did also want to mention the CppCon 2023 talk by Peter Muldoon [Exceptionally Bad: The Misuse of Exceptions in C++ & How to...