Mateusz Hawrus

@fourstepper, as discussed, let's merge it anyway and follow up with proposals of bringing metadata in sync with k8s metadata

@BertHartm I know it's been a while, but would you be willing to contribute to this document with your suggestion for v2: https://github.com/OpenSLO/OpenSLO/blob/main/enhancements/v2alpha1.md#datasource?

Coming back to this I think that at this stage having such logic would be an overkill for the spec implementations and thus spec itself. The AND/OR logic can be...

@gorkem is there a way to influence the message from `not` validation, it's way too vague right now? It also seems inconsistent with what I've seen so far, for example,...

I'm not so sure it is supported, I haven't found any examples on the web. I think this might be supported in the future, potentially, but not currently:  There's...

unrelated, but I guess I'll pose the question here, @abice is this intentional? It's introducing a security breach potential :/ 

in settings for the protected branch you can check this checkbox and exclude yourself from the "Require approvals" rule :) 

@abice and how about the actual feature request I made here? :D Here's a real life example: 

From what I understand, wouldn't this generate a const named `OperatorGt` and in the `ParseOperator` it would also accept "GreaterThan" value? That's not exactly what I want, since I want...

Appreciate the swift response :) I know about the prefix, it's not a problem for me here though :) As to the semantics of such solution, I feel like for...