Nicola Puppa

> I'm bit a confused right now. Could we check what cases we would now have and what this means now. All the cases that we have are: - Failed...

> @nicpuppa what's the state here for merging, feels unfortunate that this fix wasn't included in the current patch round, do you await approval by @Zelldon ? Not really, but...

> @nicpuppa we could also consider merging this into 8.5.0 still. Might be risky because we have no time to test it but it's the same for the patch releases...

I would like to work on this issue 👍

Should we backport the fix to stable 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 right ? @abbasadel cc @Zelldon @oleschoenburg @koevskinikola

reopened due to https://camunda.slack.com/archives/C04CABJF6FP/p1708509693973369 (internal). We missed to migrate the jobs which have been marked activatable back to non activatable.

It happened again: https://github.com/camunda/camunda/actions/runs/10450168824 https://github.com/camunda/camunda/actions/runs/10451253160/job/28937304725 [Test results for unit tests (1).zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16658554/Test.results.for.unit.tests.1.zip)

ZPA Triage: - Size `small` as the implementation seems straight forward - Priority `upcoming` as seems to be bad for the java client - Severity is `mid` because there are...

Hey @megglos , I addressed all your comments. Please have another look 👀

> is this lacking? I think this command is already implemented in Zeebe, see https://github.com/camunda/zeebe/blob/main/zeebe/clients/java/src/main/java/io/camunda/zeebe/client/impl/command/DeleteResourceCommandImpl.java