Nicolas Sebrecht

@chris001 You're right. Patches are welcome. ,-)

@chris001 Open a new bug report or start a new mailing list thread to not hijack this report, please.

Thank you very much for this report. Starting a new issue was the good thing to do. ,-) I'll improve the doc.

The really problematic servers are Microsoft's products. Actually, auto-detection might be the good thing to do at that point. Not only for filtering. I don't know. As for any other...

Documentation updated: http://www.offlineimap.org/doc/FAQ.html#exchange-and-office365.

Yes, @ezyang 's posts are well known. The algorithm is not the reason why I intend a **deep** refactoring. The algo in OfflineIMAP is good. It's more the implementation that...

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:50:00AM -0700, Chris Coleman wrote: > One algo that needs improving is the algo that determines message > unique identity. > > Currently using...

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:41:35AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > > Best thing to improve quality of the results would be to implement a > > message unique...

Nice. With Message-ID check in the run when UIDVALIDITY changed for a mailbox with say 1000 mails, this would mean: - SEARCH the new UIDs (no time overhead against NO...

Do you run the `next` branch or the official v7.2.3 release? I think this issue might come from this change #599.