nicola cabiddu

I am reading through this thread, it seems to me that each SDK has it own way of interacting with core in order to fix the issue of having a...

OK, so what about an extra getter that returns the schema on disk to be used by the SDK if needed? Otherwise, we will have to close this.

I want just to double-check the concept, which seems wrong to me: For example, if we do a migration for an object in which we remove a property (e.g we...

> This is only applicable to Additive mode. Ah OK, now this makes sense to me... it seemed such a big breaking change .so the implementation must change as well....

Hello @AlexIzh any update on this issue?

Hello @AlexIzh, thanks for your response. It should be absolutely fine to use realm from 2 different applications or SDKs and be able to share data via the database, provided...

Also, @AlexIzh if you have a code sample to provide in order to help us to reproduce the issue, please share this with us. It would help us a lot....

Hello, Thanks for reporting this. I think this is a known issue of Realm. In which we keep growing the database virtual space, especially the fact that it is reproducible...

I am not sure about naming, but this should do, in order to notify SDKs when DB read transaction is advanced. I still need to add tests around this. Furthermore,...

> Yep, I am trying to understand where the other callbacks are added following what we do in the coordinator...