Nico Jansen

Hmm if you want to make it 100% reactive, you can also add a the functionality directly to mutation testing elements by adding a `srcSocket` attribute to point to a...

Yeah, I've been thinking about this a lot. Would #1472 be something that could work for you? I think we would need a more robust solution in the future, but...

The solution that I want to add is allowing for `ignore`-plugins. The idea is simple: it is provided a babel AST node, and it returns a boolean (or something like...

Stryker needs it to run in band, so coverage per test can be reported back to Stryker. During mutation testing, Stryker already runs multiple test runners in parallel, so adding...

Ah sorry, I see you specified "initial run" in the title. If you run into a timeout then you can use [dryRunTimeoutMinutes](https://stryker-mutator.io/docs/stryker-js/configuration#dryruntimeoutminutes-number). How long does a normal unit test run...

I think #1655 would solve the use case where you simply want to run Stryker with Jest on a single file in a large code base. I'll add the hacktoberfest...

@Edgpaez that would be very breaking and I don't know if it would add a lot. My guess is that you mean `stryker run path/to/my-source-file-to-mutate.js` rather than `my-test.js`. You can...

> @nicojs if I understand correctly, `runInBand` is not needed when `coverageAnalysis: 'off'`, right? That would be true. If you want, you can create a PR for that case. However,...

@sincerekamal Are you using native ECMA script modules by any chance? If so, then that's the issue. You will need to run with `--maxTestRunnerReuse 1`. This is bad for performance,...

@sincerekamal do you think you could find some time to test my hypothesis and report back here? 😇