Nathan Zimmerberg comments

Results 150 comments of


                                            Nathan Zimmerberg

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

Here is the old version of the function that was causing allocations. ```julia julia> function bar(a::R, z::S) where {R

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

I removed the extra method for `/(a::Rational, z::Complex{

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

This PR is ready to merge and will help with testing #56478

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

Bump

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

This changes the behavior of some edge cases, so it might be good to run pkgeval.

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

@nanosoldier `runtests()`

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

@nanosoldier `runtests(["SimpleLooper", "CharacteristicInvFourier", "Andes", "MetaGraphsNext", "CycleWalk", "AEMS", "PotentialFlow", "PlutoPages", "ILMPostProcessing", "DiffusionGarnet", "SBMLToolkit", "FlightSims", "GasChem", "PlantGeomTurtle", "StateSpaceAnalysis", "CollectiveSpins", "QuantumSavory", "SBMLToolkitTestSuite"])`

Avoid silent overflow in `/(x::Rational, y::Complex{Int})`

@adienes, I think this is ready to be merged. pkgeval looks good

Try using ChunkCodec as an HDF5 filter

Yes, I can try that. The next version of the ChunkCodec packages can work with Julia 1.6, so I'm not sure what the version bounds issue would be. Another issue...

Try using ChunkCodec as an HDF5 filter

In general, I think we should have one excellent default filter implementation, and then make it easier for advanced users to use custom implementations with the https://juliaio.github.io/HDF5.jl/stable/interface/dataset/#Chunks API, which is...