nguyenm100

Hm.. What's a little odd is that: 1. I can manually run the test through the docker instance of rdf4j 4.1.2 by inserting the dataset & query specified here and...

sorry been busy with some other things. looks to be something in halyard so closing. tx

[Test Results - com_msd_gin_halyard_strategy_in_halyard-strategy.txt](https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/files/9591727/Test.Results.-.com_msd_gin_halyard_strategy_in_halyard-strategy.txt) Still occuring on 4.1.3 (see attached -- had to rename from .html to .txt to upload to comment here)

@hmottestad any updates on these asserts?

just to sync, but were you able to wire up the tests mentioned here and still not seeing an issue? if so, maybe a halyard issue.

I reran the tests w/o halyard stuff and no more asserts. However, one of the test is failing and incorrect (tested against graphdb and docker rdf4j 4.2.0. graphdb returns correct...

> I did not see any further response on the mailing list about the usage of `limit()`. Does it mitigate the issue to use `limit()` right before `hasNext()`? think you...

> My point was that if this solves the issue, it would be an easy fix to deploy a strategy which replaces `hasNext()` by `limit(1).hasNext()` in every traversal. again, I...

fair enough. any chance we show the description during the search in the result list? even if just partial (say the first 40 chars + ...)?

Hi, I noticed that license problem is one of the issues highlight by apache (https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Pegasus.html) to prevent upgrade out of incubation. Is this expected to be resolved relatively soon? (next...