Noah Greifer

That's a good idea. I agree that sensitivity analyses should be easier to implement for `matchit` objects and more generally. However, the type of sensitivity analysis done by `rbounds` is...

Thank you for this report! I will take a look.

I would like this too, though I would settle for a "coefficients" object like `summary.glm()` produces, e.g., `summary(mediate(...))$coefficients`

Hi Matt, Thank you for the kind words and sorry for the confusion. `by` is documented in the `weightit()` [documentation](https://ngreifer.github.io/WeightIt/reference/weightit.html). I'll reproduce the relevant text below: > a string containing...

Glad to help. I kind of wanted to avoid that because PS models are not fit for all weighting methods, so I wanted to use the generic language of "weights...

Thanks for the bug report and sorry for the confusion. I'm working on a fix for this. The ideal fix would be to be able to use the `subset` argument...

This is a great suggestion; I will look into implementing it.

This isn't a weighting method, it's a matching method, and so would be better suited for `MatchIt` (which I also maintain). However, you can already use the method with `MatchIt`....

Thank you, unfortunately, this is for use inside `insight::get_data()` which I'm aware you have no control over. That function simply calls `model.frame()` so ideally the method for `iv_robust` objects would...

It actually produced incorrect output in that thread, as well (note the second column).