Henry Zhuang

Maybe there is some misunderstanding of Fiber.Here is our benchmark 2 years ago, which shows Fiber has much much much better performance than the current model of Node.js. Here is...

The benchmark was 2 years ago, I'll run a benchmark recently and update the result. But before that I can say something I can conclude. In the previous [benchmark](https://github.com/fibjs/fibjs/blob/master/perf/http_server/performance-en.md#benchmark-result-1), it...

Here is a very simple benchmark under the newest version of both Node.js & fibjs. benchmark.js ```js const fs = require('fs'); const isFiber = typeof module === 'undefined'; const num...

Actually, it is already implemented in fibjs for a long time. benchmark.js ```js const fs = require('fs'); const sync = require('util').sync; const num = 100000; let readFile = filename =>...

@benjamingr I'm afraid you still didn't get the point. There are lots of work to do if you want to bring fiber into the core because the whole libuv needs...

Sorry for that. My fault. My point is : - Fiber is much fast. - Fiber vs Bluebird is confusing. They are not the same thing. - Fiber in JavaScript...

Great. Here is the key point: fiber should be compared with [libuv + bluebird]. I mean if we use fiber rewrites the whole architecture include libuv which will bring the...