NiMARE
NiMARE copied to clipboard
Add `nimads` module with implementations of NIMADS objects
This will probably never be merged, so I will say that it references #218 instead of closes it. I just wanted to put together a skeleton of the nimads module, so that we can determine what's necessary vs. optional and what might be difficult to implement in NiMARE.
Codecov Report
Base: 88.64% // Head: 84.67% // Decreases project coverage by -3.97% :warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
910037e) compared to base (282f197). Patch coverage: 68.02% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:exclamation: Current head 910037e differs from pull request most recent head 8c4d359. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8c4d359 to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #628 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.64% 84.67% -3.97%
==========================================
Files 38 43 +5
Lines 4324 4693 +369
==========================================
+ Hits 3833 3974 +141
- Misses 491 719 +228
| Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| nimare/nimads.py | 64.22% <64.22%> (ø) |
|
| nimare/workflows/neurosynth_compose.py | 69.23% <69.23%> (ø) |
|
| nimare/io.py | 95.37% <100.00%> (+0.22%) |
:arrow_up: |
| nimare/workflows/__init__.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
| nimare/meta/utils.py | 54.29% <0.00%> (-41.44%) |
:arrow_down: |
| nimare/meta/kernel.py | 80.12% <0.00%> (-15.67%) |
:arrow_down: |
| nimare/extract/extract.py | 42.97% <0.00%> (-4.90%) |
:arrow_down: |
| nimare/meta/cbma/ale.py | 94.92% <0.00%> (-1.70%) |
:arrow_down: |
| nimare/meta/cbma/mkda.py | 97.08% <0.00%> (-1.68%) |
:arrow_down: |
| nimare/meta/cbma/base.py | 95.63% <0.00%> (-0.39%) |
:arrow_down: |
| ... and 23 more |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
ref neurostuff/neurostore#269
@jdkent would you be willing to link any issues this should close?