Bobin Joseph

Results 32 comments of Bobin Joseph

So Gluetun/qbt -> other containers is not working. Iptables is blocking Other containers -> qbt is working.

OK, so the problem is with `Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP)`. I understand that we want this to block traffic if there is no VPN and we should keep it that...

So I pulled the latest image and see that DNS has stopped working. Something must have changed. ``` 2020-11-07T13:46:36.191-0700 INFO dns configurator: downloading root hints from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/qdm12/files/master/named.root.updated 2020-11-07T13:46:41.193-0700 ERROR port...

I get this when I try running unbound manually. ``` / # unbound [1604782560] unbound[79:0] error: Could not open /etc/unbound/unbound.conf: No such file or directory [1604782560] unbound[79:0] warning: Continuing with...

Hey @qdm12 , Wanted to provide an update. I pulled the latest image this morning and everything works as expected. Local containers can be resolved and connected to from the...

Yeah, so my local LAN is 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.1.119 is my local dhcp server. But based on the routing table, that packet gets put on the vpn tunnel. I'm not...

That also brings be to the other point, is DoT working? Cause traffic to 1.1.1.1 is UDP/53. So DOT is not working, but DNS goes out the vpn tunnel.

So I figured, this would help in understanding the overall situation. I should add that `Can resolve internet names using UDP/53 – NO` is a good thing. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11762633/99126944-ff767f00-25bb-11eb-85d5-162ce842aa30.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11762633/99126972-0c936e00-25bc-11eb-8356-dc8d8937edf2.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/11762633/99126999-22089800-25bc-11eb-802b-a330212e3ccc.png)

Hey, I wanted to check to see if you can make 1 change that can get all this resolved. See [this ](https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2014-November/003596.html)link. Currently unbound does not let you query from...

Oh, take your time. So in that link, what I wanted to point out was to add the ` access-control allow x.x.x.x/x` rule. That does not exist. Can you see...