application-engine icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
application-engine copied to clipboard

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities

Open snyk-bot opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `maven` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • pom.xml

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Upgrade Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 688/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JAVA-COMFASTERXMLJACKSONCORE-3038424
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind:
2.13.2.2 -> 2.13.4
com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml:
2.13.2 -> 2.13.4
com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs:jackson-jaxrs-json-provider:
2.13.2 -> 2.13.4
com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-jsonSchema:
2.13.2 -> 2.13.4
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Vulnerabilities that could not be fixed

  • Upgrade:
    • Could not upgrade org.springframework.boot:[email protected] to org.springframework.boot:[email protected]; Reason could not apply upgrade, dependency is managed externally ; Location: https://maven-central.storage-download.googleapis.com/maven2/org/springframework/boot/spring-boot-dependencies/2.7.0/spring-boot-dependencies-2.7.0.pom
    • Could not upgrade org.springframework.boot:[email protected] to org.springframework.boot:[email protected]; Reason could not apply upgrade, dependency is managed externally ; Location: https://maven-central.storage-download.googleapis.com/maven2/org/springframework/boot/spring-boot-dependencies/2.7.0/spring-boot-dependencies-2.7.0.pom
    • Could not upgrade org.springframework.boot:[email protected] to org.springframework.boot:[email protected]; Reason could not apply upgrade, dependency is managed externally ; Location: https://maven-central.storage-download.googleapis.com/maven2/org/springframework/boot/spring-boot-dependencies/2.7.0/spring-boot-dependencies-2.7.0.pom

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information: 🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Denial of Service (DoS)

snyk-bot avatar Oct 03 '22 11:10 snyk-bot

This PR has 8 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +4 -4
Percentile : 3.2%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.xml : +4 -4

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification) of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? :thumbsup:  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email) Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarqubecloud[bot] avatar Oct 03 '22 12:10 sonarqubecloud[bot]