sysbox icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sysbox copied to clipboard

Issue: Excessive Creation of Temporary Directories in Root with Sysbox

Open xabru opened this issue 1 year ago • 2 comments

Description:

We have observed that many temporary directories are being created in the root directory with names following the pattern .sysbox-sysfs-<number>. This is causing clutter and potential confusion.

System Environment:

  • Sysbox version: v0.6.4
  • Dockerfile Template: Systemd in Docker

Additional Information:

This issue might have arisen because I masked the following services using systemctl:

systemctl mask \
	systemd-udevd.service \
	systemd-udevd-kernel.socket \
	systemd-udevd-control.socket \
	systemd-modules-load.service \
	sys-kernel-config.mount \
	sys-kernel-debug.mount \
	sys-kernel-tracing.mount \
	e2scrub_all.timer \
	e2scrub_reap \
	accounts-daemon.service \
	rtkit-daemon.service \
	systemd-hostnamed.service

$_ ls -hasl /

└> ll /
total 284
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 ./
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 ../
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root   root       7 Apr 22 08:08 bin -> usr/bin/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Mar 31 04:00 bin.usr-is-merged/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Apr 22 08:08 boot/
drwxr-xr-x   6 root   root     440 Aug 24 17:50 dev/
-rwxr-xr-x   1 root   root       0 Aug 24 17:50 .dockerenv*
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Aug 23 07:48 dockerstartup/
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 etc/
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 23 07:40 home/
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root   root       7 Apr 22 08:08 lib -> usr/lib/
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root   root       9 Apr 22 08:08 lib64 -> usr/lib64/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Apr  8 09:37 lib.usr-is-merged/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Aug  1 06:59 media/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Aug  1 06:59 mnt/
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 opt/
dr-xr-xr-x 283 root   root       0 Aug 24 17:50 proc/
drwx------   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 18:59 root/
drwxr-xr-x  20 root   root     580 Aug 24 17:51 run/
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root   root       8 Apr 22 08:08 sbin -> usr/sbin/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Mar 31 04:00 sbin.usr-is-merged/
drwxr-xr-x   2 root   root    4096 Aug  1 06:59 srv/
dr-xr-xr-x  13 nobody nogroup    0 Aug 24 18:10 sys/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1086082501/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1098625909/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1220785409/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-1227003664/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1270347815/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1402730274/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-1427450857/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-1431106688/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-148529927/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-149844544/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1557262215/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-1591870079/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1692417296/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-1863566724/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-1988865741/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2052994440/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2188883916/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2412479115/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-269341428/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-270781546/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2722782661/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-273937039/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2892516956/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-2924257033/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3224083108/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3229380096/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-324496473/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3591021414/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-3622867146/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3633530951/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-3707117874/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3742760121/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-3787667621/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-4095605731/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-4136466978/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-4175937595/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-586173192/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-628597558/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-714564999/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-735075657/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-740134491/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-863786270/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:51 .sysbox-sysfs-867797088/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-927480688/
drwx------   2 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 .sysbox-sysfs-981093558/
drwxrwxrwt   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 18:59 tmp/
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug  1 06:59 usr/
drwxr-xr-x   1 root   root    4096 Aug 24 17:50 var/

xabru avatar Aug 25 '24 00:08 xabru

We have experiences this as well, and are currently working around it by manually cleaning up these empty directories.

AidanAbd avatar Aug 26 '24 17:08 AidanAbd

Hi @xabru, @AidanAbd , thanks for reporting this.

Yes, I can confirm this is a bug. I have a fix in mind, will work on this ASAP. Sorry for the inconvenience.

ctalledo avatar Aug 27 '24 04:08 ctalledo

Hello @ctalledo @rodnymolina

I have tested sysbox v0.6.5 on GKE 1.29 and still see .sysbox-sysfs directories, but now there are also .sysbox-procfs directories in /

When i execute docker run -it alpine:latest sh inside a sysbox pod, additionally i can see .sysbox-procfs directories in the / of the inner container. In some scenarios this directory causing permission denied error as it's owned by root:root. Previously I used image ghcr.io/nestybox/sysbox-deploy-k8s:v0.6.5-dev-0 and it was working fine, but for some reason got deleted after official release of v0.6.5 :(

Now my projects are broken, because i can't rollback to v0.6.4 since i need support of sysbox-fs emulation to allow writes to '/proc/sys/kernel/shm*' paths, and this feature was added in v0.6.5-dev-0, but now in official v0.6.5 these .sysbox-procfs and .sysbox-sysfs are causing .sysbox-procfs permission denied issues. Could you please have a look?

EddieX64 avatar Nov 11 '24 13:11 EddieX64

Hi @EddieX64, apologies for the late reply.

Thanks for letting me know, it was my mistake (thought I had fixed this in v0.6.5 but I made a mistake in the fix and did not catch it somehow).

This PR will fix it once and for all: https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox-fs/pull/100

We will generate a v0.6.6 release soon afterwards.

ctalledo avatar Dec 05 '24 03:12 ctalledo

Hi @EddieX64, apologies for the late reply.

Thanks for letting me know, it was my mistake (thought I had fixed this in v0.6.5 but I made a mistake in the fix and did not catch it somehow).

This PR will fix it once and for all: nestybox/sysbox-fs#100

We will generate a v0.6.6 release soon afterwards.

We are also experiencing the permissions problem with '/proc/sys/kernel/shm*' on certain builds.

Is there a rough estimate when release 0.6.6 will be out?

Or is there a Dev registry we can use in the meantime?

Thanks.

aldcons avatar Dec 10 '24 10:12 aldcons

Hi @EddieX64, apologies for the late reply. Thanks for letting me know, it was my mistake (thought I had fixed this in v0.6.5 but I made a mistake in the fix and did not catch it somehow). This PR will fix it once and for all: nestybox/sysbox-fs#100 We will generate a v0.6.6 release soon afterwards.

We are also experiencing the permissions problem with '/proc/sys/kernel/shm*' on certain builds.

Is there a rough estimate when release 0.6.6 will be out?

Or is there a Dev registry we can use in the meantime?

Thanks.

After all that, we seem to now be getting caught with this one - https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox-fs/pull/101

Is that also in the next release @ctalledo ?

aldcons avatar Dec 10 '24 14:12 aldcons

Hi @aldcons,

Is there a rough estimate when release 0.6.6 will be out?

We are targeting end of this week.

It will fix both https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox-fs/pull/100 and https://github.com/nestybox/sysbox-fs/pull/101. Plus some other fixes.

Or is there a Dev registry we can use in the meantime?

There is no dev registry, but you can always build the sysbox package from source by cloning the sysbox repo.

$ git clone --recurse-submodules [email protected]:nestybox/sysbox.git
$ cd sysbox
$ Edit the VERSION file (e.g., `0.6.6-dev`)
$ cd sysbox-pkgr
$ make sysbox-ce-repo <path-to-where-you-cloned-sysbox>
$ make sysbox-ce-deb

This will generate the Sysbox Debian package under directory sysbox-pkgr/deb/build/amd64/ubuntu-jammy/.

You can then install that on your host with sudo apt-get install .... But first uninstall any current sysbox installation with sudo apt-get purge sysbox-ce.

If all is rignt, the systemctl status sysbox should show Sysbox has the version you put in the VERSION file in the steps above.

ctalledo avatar Dec 10 '24 17:12 ctalledo

Hi @ctalledo After upgrading to Sysbox v0.6.5, we have also encountered the same issue. Could you please provide an updated timeline or any news regarding the release of v0.6.6?

chloe6888 avatar Dec 30 '24 08:12 chloe6888

Hi @chloe6888 , Sysbox v0.6.6 is now released, please give it a try and let me know if the problem persists (should be resolved).

ctalledo avatar Jan 06 '25 18:01 ctalledo