Néstor Espinoza

True. Will mark it as a to-do enhancement!

Hi @JonasKemmer, Sorry for coming so late to this. I do have an idea on what is going on, but don't have the time today to work on this. Will...

Hi @LucaNap, Yes, this is actually _not_ a desirable output of calling the `evaluate` method for sure, and is in my to-do to look at. I hope to have it...

We could, but I _really_ think this is something the user should check. I fear this will always be so far in our priority list that it will never get...

Hi @jordibp99, Thanks for bringing this up! Could you share a [minimum working example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example) for this problem so I can take a look at it? Doesn't have to be your...

Hi @MohammadEftekhar, Currently `juliet` does not _directly_ fit for secondary eclipses, but you can of course deactivate the limb-darkening by setting `q1` equal to zero to mimic a secondary eclipse....

Hi Mohammad, That would work as well. Remember that the limb-darkening law is not defined by q1 and q2, but by u1 and u2 such that, e.g., for the quadratic...

Hi @StephanStock, Yeah, this has been in the backburner for me for a while. I think it would mean adding an extra "dataset" type to `juliet`, so as we have...

Hi @tronsgaard, Thanks a ton for this feedback. I do think returning the samples for the user to take care of this is the best solution --- will take this...

Hi @JonasKemmer, This is a good call. I'll try to implement this in a future release. N.