rfcs icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
rfcs copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon nervosnetwork

Fix inconsistent naming in RFCs and update the status of some RFCs

Open zhangsoledad opened this issue 11 months ago • 3 comments

This PR unifies the naming conventions across multiple RFCs, ensuring consistency in RFCs. Additionally, it updates the status of several RFCs to reflect their latest status.

zhangsoledad avatar Mar 12 '25 15:03 zhangsoledad

In older documents or other sources, some references still use outdated naming conventions. Can we provide a mapping table, such as:

Edition CKB2023 → CKB Edition Meepo (on 2024/??)

XuJiandong avatar Mar 13 '25 05:03 XuJiandong

In older documents or other sources, some references still use outdated naming conventions. Can we provide a mapping table, such as:

Edition CKB2023 → CKB Edition Meepo (on 2024/??)

https://github.com/nervosnetwork/rfcs/blob/5a0e339bcbd88f6ca283cd57a13b1c808503313f/rfcs/0053-ckb-hardfork/0053-ckb-hardfork.md#historical-editions @XuJiandong

zhangsoledad avatar Mar 14 '25 01:03 zhangsoledad

Just being curious: why do we name it as CKB Edition Meepo, I feel that CKB Meepo Edition is more like proper English grammar

xxuejie avatar Mar 19 '25 04:03 xxuejie