Neo Technology Build Agent

**Comment by [albertodelazzari](https://github.com/albertodelazzari)** _Tuesday May 23, 2017 at 07:29 GMT_ ---- @jexp there is something lightweight, maybe we can get some idea for the "crontab-expression" from this project: http://www.sauronsoftware.it/projects/cron4j/index.php and...

**Comment by [jexp](https://github.com/jexp)** _Sunday May 28, 2017 at 19:13 GMT_ ---- Sounds good. But I'm currently rethinking if this is a good idea in the first place, or if this...

**Comment by [ikwattro](https://github.com/ikwattro)** _Sunday May 28, 2017 at 20:34 GMT_ ---- Also the lib latest release dates back in 2013 ? http://www.sauronsoftware.it/projects/cron4j/download.php https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/it.sauronsoftware.cron4j/cron4j

**Comment by [albertodelazzari](https://github.com/albertodelazzari)** _Monday May 29, 2017 at 07:09 GMT_ ---- @ikwattro I think so but we only want to take the "interesting" part of it, in particular I'm talking...

**Comment by [emregency](https://github.com/emregency)** _Tuesday Dec 24, 2019 at 16:57 GMT_ ---- @jexp is it still something that you consider? Would you recommend [`apoc.periodic.schedule` ](https://neo4j.com/docs/labs/apoc/3.5/background-operations/background-jobs/#periodic-background) as a start to implement cron-like...

**Comment by [conker84](https://github.com/conker84)** _Wednesday May 12, 2021 at 14:06 GMT_ ---- @InverseFalcon is this still valid?

**Comment by [albertodelazzari](https://github.com/albertodelazzari)** _Monday Aug 27, 2018 at 09:26 GMT_ ---- @jexp if I want to skip a property probably I have to face two different use cases: 1. skip...

**Comment by [conker84](https://github.com/conker84)** _Thursday May 13, 2021 at 09:52 GMT_ ---- @jexp can you elaborate this a little bit?

**Comment by [Emptyfruit](https://github.com/Emptyfruit)** _Wednesday Nov 03, 2021 at 07:48 GMT_ ---- Is there a workaround to get similar behaviour ?

**Comment by [mperini](https://github.com/mperini)** _Monday Apr 11, 2022 at 15:54 GMT_ ---- > Is there a workaround to get similar behaviour ? Definitely **not** an elegant solution, and only works for...