fix: wrap subpath in '' (#2754)

[jsoref]

• Fix #2754

before

[Check Spelling/Check Spelling] GoGitActionCache get content check-spelling/check-spelling with sha 001867346ea5ba54ea2660ec0d227ff5965813f8 subpath  at /Users/jsoref/.cache/act/check-spelling-check-spelling.git

after

[Check Spelling/Check Spelling] GoGitActionCache get content check-spelling/check-spelling with sha 001867346ea5ba54ea2660ec0d227ff5965813f8 subpath '' at /Users/jsoref/.cache/act/check-spelling-check-spelling.git

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 42.85714% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.65%. Comparing base (bd4bc99) to head (8874785). Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/runner/action_cache.go	20.00%	4 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2755   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.65%   74.65%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       11139    11147    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits         8316     8322    +6     
- Misses       2186     2190    +4     
+ Partials      637      635    -2     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[jsoref]

I mean, I'd rather act use `...` instead of '...', but that's a larger discussion and yes, some extra quoting adventures would be involved.

This PR is just for general English readability and consistency.

[ChristopherHX]

Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (42.85%) is below the target coverage (50.00%)

I do not think we can run old and new actions cache tests in nektos/act (would double the test duration), so coverage is a problem....

my own version has removed the old actions cache, like I planned for nektos/act and has much better coverage for these Line of Code. We would need help from cplee to bypass this check.

[panekj]

I'd rather remove Codecov (or disable CI failure for it), I know it feels nice that numbers go up for good things but we are not a corporation that has to deliver certain quality, just few people trying to make things better. It would be better if it just reported coverage without killing contributions.