Neil Chadwick

Results 33 comments of Neil Chadwick

# Notes on Sample vs specimen As presented at meeting 12/1/23 **From EC7 part 2 (new draft)** (but not changed much if at all) 3.1.3.6 sample defined amount of rock,...

This comment could apply to any of the types of model. First, I think we should have **Model** as a thing/object above all the model subtypes. Possibly **Ground model** if...

See also my comments on #22 which are relevant to this.

Seequent's Leapfrog is becoming dominant amongst larger organisations in the UK. I've not used it for a couple of years, but my recollection is that it accepts a very wide...

As per my comment in #16 , same applies... I think this term should be reserved for (what I refer to as) observational models. We may need to new item...

I've never thought of core as a sample before, but conceptually it seems fair enough. We would need to ensure that core run information is captured (depth from/to). I guess...

I'm not an expert in hydrogeology, but I've worked with hydrogeologists so have some experience. Based on this and a little bit of research here are my thoughts... I quite...

Copied from my comment in #7, but more relevant here... It is the geotechnicalunit that will be used in analysis/design. This is normally derived from the geologic units. The classification...

At the meeting yesterday, it became clear that I (and possibly some others) had interpreted things a slightly different way. The discussion helped to clarify matters. For the record, and...

For information, the current Draft of the upcoming revision to Eurocode 7 (Part 1) includes the following definitions: 3.1.6.4 **Geotechnical Design Model** conceptual representation of the site derived from the...