Nicolas Dierckxsens

Hi, thanks for reporting! I know what the problem is but i al currently on holiday so can't fix it at the moment. I found it just before I left,...

Hi, Got back from holiday and I think I solved the problem. It should go much faster and use much less memory You can download the updated version (3.4)

I would happy to check this, but could you run it again with extended log to 1. I would need that to see what's wrong and to fix the code...

I also saw your coverage is probably too low to check for heteroplasmy around 1%, maybe beter to increase to 2% or 3%

Hi, Thanks but the extended log option was still set to 0, you should set it 1, else I can't see what is wrong

ow no sorry, just saw I forgot download your new zip file and opened the old one, nevermind :)

Those fastq files, is that all the data? And is capture data then, because it can't be WGS? And why are the read lengths so different, is it quality trimmend?

No, the problem is not related to that, the assemblies were correct, but it sometimes cut a small part of the sequence in the output. I will fix this bug,...

But what is the problem with the last run, if the de novo assembly was successful, there was no interference with NUMTs (I saw you have no ambiguous nucleotides in...

Those failed cases, how those log files look like?