Nike Dattani issues

Results 42 issues of


                                            Nike Dattani

BCR methods should have coefficients represented in terms of k not in terms of m. Because it's misleading to think that these coefficients are exponential when they are just an exponential of a logarithm!

Typos

- [ ] PTR-BCR-3, matrix bottom-left corner was 2^(i +-2) and the +- should either be + or - but I don't know what. SFR_Derivations.pdf in the "everything_else" folder seems...

Proposition 3.14 of Gruber's thesis seems to be an alternative RBS (it's Rosenberg-like but not the same)

Correct Catherine's affiliation to what it actually was when she helped (when she was full-time at a university and a "consultant" for D-Wave)

Amherst University doesn't exist... there's UMass Amherst and Amherst College.

Bit-flipping, not only is the result submodular, but the range of coefficients of quadratic terms is much smaller

Add to "Further References"

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.01588.pdf

"Efficient optimization of perturbative gadgets" by Cao and Kais can be added to the "Further References" page at the end of the book

First page we are just changing -N(b1b2b3) to N(b1 - b1b2 -b1b3). what quadratization is that?

4-local with no auxiliaries:https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.07683.pdf

Add examples for all SFR gadgets

For "symmetric function reduction" gadgets, the examples are almost always just copied and pasted from some previous page. Now that Tin has derived the polynomial expressions for most of these...