Nathan Woulfe

Hi @ryanlewis26, I'm not sure how this would be related to Plumber - Plumber simply uses the ContentService to publish nodes at the completion of the workflow, there's no modification...

Magic! I love issues that don't mean work!

Hi @jonroberts24 could you please add this issue on the Plumber2 repo - https://github.com/nathanwoulfe/Plumber-2. This repository is for the v7 version only I'll see if I can reproduce the error,...

@RihabAlrefae that error is unrelated to the logs exception (changes to GitHub API that I wasn't aware of). Could you please check the UmbracoTraceLog for anything raised by Workflow.Api.LogsController.GetDates()

Hi @ThomasHerckenrath, that's by design, but honestly I don't know why... I want to revise the emails to allow custom templates, but will fix this separately, since it really doesn't...

Hi @tkf144 Couple of questions/clarifications - is blue user approving each step, or is the workflow completing automatically (logs look like blue user is approving, just want to confirm); and...

That's definitely a bit odd - like you said, the timestamps don't suggest that the workflow skipped steps, there's several seconds between stages being completed. If the user doesn't have...

Right. I've run through the following: - configured a workflow with five steps, different group for each step - added a user to the second step group, and only that...

@tkf144, I did a bit more digging, and hopefully have found the fix - there's a pair of events raised when a workflow task is submitted, one to modify the...

Hey @robertjf, have a look at https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco.Forms.Issues/issues/1129 and the related PR (https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-CMS/pull/15447) which explain this issue and provide a temporary (if a little hacky) workaround.