Nate Prewitt

Alright, waiting for tests to pass and I think this should be good to go. If I can get another pair of eyes from another maintainer, I'll merge and cut...

I posted a response to the recursion issue in https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6716#issuecomment-2127152349. This is already known behavior that was reported to be broken in arcgis previously due to misuse of truststore (https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-python-api/issues/1698)....

https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6721 is staged for release on Tuesday. We're going to hold releasing over the weekend to avoid any unnecessary pain for ops teams and will release after the holiday in...

@achapkowski If you're using the `init_poolmanager` setup now like what's linked in the example, you shouldn't need to make any additional changes. 2.32.3 should work the same as 2.31.0 and...

Alright, 2.32.3 is out. Thanks everyone for your patience, please let us know if you're still hitting this failure case after upgrading.

Hi @joshzcold, could you clarify more about the expected functionality with a `http+docker` scheme vs calling the URI with just `http`. Is docker-py using a custom Requests adapter or was...

It looks like there's a proposed patch for docker [here](https://github.com/docker/docker-py/pull/3257). Their sub-adapter seems to reasonably have been relying on implementing `get_connection`. We'll use this issue to track the change in...

We wrote the #6655 fix trying to avoid breaking users that were relying on the existing behavior of `get_connection` in their custom Adapters but missed the other side where they...

@felixfontein and everyone else following along, we've iterated through a few alternatives but each has similar impact on a different user group so a "fix" would only be shifting the...

@sergiosmcr the patch needs to be done in docker-py which is already staged in https://github.com/docker/docker-py/pull/3257. Requests 2.23.2 was just to make the integration point for docker-py easier. As I noted...