Nate Prewitt

Hi @itamaro, this was an [intentional change](https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/5917) in 2.27.0 due to [this bug](https://bugs.python.org/issue43882) in CPython. The behavior of `urlparse` fundamentally changed from Python 3.9 onwards which makes supporting schemeless URIs...

@turingnixstyx I don't think there's anything to be solved. Requests cannot support schemeless proxies in Python 3.9+. It's an unfortunately tedious change for end-users, but we can't do much about...

@turingnixstyx, there's unfortunately nothing well curated for entry development on Requests at the moment. You may consider taking a look at https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3 or another Python project. Specifically, identifying issues that...

I haven't had a chance to dig into the failure yet, but it's showing 26% coverage which seems _extremely_ low. I tried to go back to find [older examples of...

It looks like we're possibly hitting an issue with `coverage combine` similar to what's noted in https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1036. We're generating 21 files for the 21 tests across 7 interpreters. From Ned's...

We don't have solidified dates for 2.32.0 but I would wager it's sometime in mid-late June. As for a pre-release, time permitting I'll take a look at it but can't...

I am actually able to replicate this on macOS in Firefox 115.3.1esr (64-bit). It appears whitespace in these blocks are being replaced with `span` tags with the `w` CSS class...

Hi @Rach81, This is unrelated to Requests. You're installing a version of urllib3 that's incompatible with the version of Boto3 bundled in your runtime. You'll either need to pin your...

Upgrading Requests to 2.30.0 allows for the use of previously released urllib3 2.0. If you're using something like `pip download` to create your Lambda package, it will eagerly pull the...

I'll try to further clarify the comments above since there's some confusion. The solution if you rely on one of the breaking changes with urllib3 2.0's release is to pin...