Nate Cook

@swift-ci Please test

@xwu Thanks for opening this issue! I definitely agree that this it would be nice to fill this hole — let's talk a bit about the different ways we could...

> The drawbacks I can see are that `ascending` and `descending` would be less discoverable than a separate API, and it'd be most ergonomic if left as free functions but...

@CTMacUser and @karwa Absolutely, still exploring the API surfaces here. Thanks!

@swift-ci Please test

Sorry for not reviewing this sooner! I'm wondering what this looks like if we approach it from the perspective of `count(where:)` rather than `contains(where:)`. I think a `count(upTo:where:)` method would...

Thanks for this contribution, @CTMacUser! I don't think these additions rise to the level of utility that would warrant inclusion in the `Algorithms` package at this time. As @xwu points...

Agreed on this — let's discuss here before going down an implementation path.

We really should cover all the different kinds of syntax that are allowed, such as grouped short options and `--option=value` style options. May be good to say what isn't currently...

It would probably also be helpful to be able to hide an entire option group from the help for a command.