Nate Bragg

Given how long this has sat here, I have my doubts about it being addressed.

I expressed some of my thoughts over gitter, but I'll summarize: It would be good to make a syntax that could later be subsumed by a more general meaning. Namely,...

First, to quickly address your comments about the alternate version, that was just demonstrating that a submachine solution could work either way. Now, regarding returning states. I agree, and I...

Oh, even better name for that last syntax proposal: "substates".

Now I'm wondering if there is a way to have a syntax sugar over that, like `if p then t else f` can be sugar for `case p of true...

I'm confused. You say this is a serious error, but it's fixed already on master? If it's fixed, why would it matter? Also, could you speak to #541? I'd really...

In practice, my code uses -1e-6 instead of -.1 (I just reduced it to a minimal reproduction). I take it that means that's off the table? I found that this...

Furthermore, using -3e-6 is infeasible, but -2e-6 is feasible with an optimum of 200, which is incorrect (it should be 100).

I retract my previous comment. I didn't realize I was minimizing. Only CPLEX succeeds with -1e-6. Gurobi gives an incorrect result at -1e-4 with a warning that its tolerances were...

Hi! Any updates on this? Thanks!