Darren A. Natale

@nlharris Yes, in a sense. The review was completed and the ontology found to contain some deficiencies with respect to some principles (I don't recall the details). We then asked...

True, though one could argue that--for obsolete ontologies--what other ontology would be of most interest is probably the KEY piece of information. I don't feel strongly about it, though I...

From @matentzn: Wow this is some principle.. :) I love this, but this will put a huge burden on ontology developers.. If they use GitHub, maybe we can promote an...

This principle was moved forward during the Operations call of 30-Nov-2021, so the principle itself is set. There was, however, general agreement during the call that this could be a...

Awaits refinement of wording by EWG. We typically do so when the person who wrote the original draft is available, but I was recently informed that this person is no...

I'm the one that wrote the ticket on github. The draft was by Krishna Udaiwal.

From the EWG discussion on this: Check to see if term labels reproduce those found in other ontologies without using original IDs. BioPortal mapping does this. Main idea here is...

I think we'd need to figure out how to do this by hand, just to get an idea of how it should (or if it could) work. To my knowledge...

If I'm not mistaken, BioPortal just does it. I looked into it once upon a time (when looking at a new ontology), and did find it helpful. Not sure how...

Please note that orthogonality is NOT part of this principle. The automated check should have two components: (1) A statement of scope for the ontology; and (2) Content that reflects...