nashqueue
nashqueue
> Instead of following the current non-interactive defaults, where we start each message at the next aligned power of two, we would start the message at the next index that...
> Transaction fees should be deterministic (like in Bitcoin) given Celestia doesn't have shared smart contract state. If it doesn't that should be fixed. Assuming transaction fees are deterministic, then...
I think the optimization here is that you don't have to gossip tail padding rows .
With Option 1, do we add new things to the square, or do we add it to the state? > PFBs are ordered behind non PFBs; thus they are dropped...
> Add the signer field to each blob which gets encoded at the start of the first share. That way rollups need only query all the blobs for the affiliated...
What is stopping the Rollup Protocol / Sequencer from putting the signer themselves as metadata into the blob? (Or any other metadata for that matter) . What are we gaining...
So you are getting the additional guarantee with the honest majority assumption of Celestia verifying that this blob was signed by a certain key.
Follow-up Issues: - Before Blob Module: - Make Hash not a response to DA but calculated on the fly - Revert hash a response in proto - Revert changes to...
@gupadhyaya This does not unblock the separation of block/header, as we would need to enable fraud proofs. But for pessimistic chains, we don't need the ISR overhead. We wouldn't need...
Can we post an empty share instead? Like just a 0? Would this deserialize correctly?