napalm-huawei-vrp
napalm-huawei-vrp copied to clipboard
napalm-automation-community
get_lldp_neighbors_detail
def get_lldp_neighbors_detail(self): results = {} command = 'display lldp neighbor brief' output = self.device.send_command(command) lines = output.split("\n") for line in lines: # translate Huawai skip_lines = ['local', '-----'] local_iface = line[:14].strip() remote_port = line[39:65].strip().replace(" ", "") remote_system_name = line[14:39].strip() local_iface = local_iface.replace("XGE", "XGigabitEthernet") remote_port = remote_port.replace("XGE", "XGigabitEthernet")
if local_iface[:5].lower() not in skip_lines:
if local_iface not in results:
results[local_iface] = []
neighbor_dict = dict()
neighbor_dict['remote_port'] = py23_compat.text_type(remote_port)
neighbor_dict['remote_system_name'] = py23_compat.text_type(remote_system_name)
results[local_iface].append(neighbor_dict)
return results
this is working for 10gig interfaces in NetBox.. i have no gig nor 40/100 gig interfaces active to test against.. is suspect that the replace statement needs to be expanded tot get them equal to the names in the config.
I wrote this as a start for use in netbox only..so see it as a partial implementation
If you need me to test on a couple of VRP devices i am glad to help out.. i am in no way a python developer :)
@mailorderbribes Thanks for your contribution.
Yes, I haven't supported get_lldp_neighbors_detail yet.
The next major release of huawei_vrp will be version 0.2.0 which will have support for get_lldp_neighbors_detail.
As for the interface name, I need to think about it, because I need to be consistent with other drivers in the community.
BTW. it is a good idea to combine NAPLAM with Netbox.I'm going to do some tests later
Keep in touch. Locus!
@tkspuk
As for the interface name, I need to think about it, because I need to be consistent with other drivers in the community.
In netbox the inconsistent naming between "get_interfaces" and "show lldp neighbor brief" is fixed in the ajax.
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/commit/bb653e733cb8b70fd3eabca8867954792df03844#diff-fb6ece1e6bb6bceb3c46c184f7f6c45b
More in general the question could be: does napalm (drivers) have to take care of fixing inconsistencies or the app using napalm To my opinion the whole purpose of napalm is to have a generic programming interface which is device independent..
I am also mailorderbribes :) Couldnt test due to bumping napalm release and the issue i opened related to py23compat
