The Nanosoldier comments

Results 183 comments of


                                            The Nanosoldier

Allow inlining methods with unmatched type parameters

[Your benchmark job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45062#issuecomment-1226752107) has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports/blob/master/benchmark/by_hash/1c0e83b_vs_e7ef4b5/report.md).

Use NewPM for optimization unless ASAN is in effect

[Your benchmark job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/46176#issuecomment-1200132919) has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports/blob/master/benchmark/by_hash/28bff5d_vs_acfdc88/report.md).

Use NewPM for optimization unless ASAN is in effect

[Your package evaluation job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/46176#issuecomment-1200132868) has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/1083828_vs_acfdc88/report.html).

[rfc] parallel marking

Something went wrong when running [your job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45639#issuecomment-1202524719): ``` NanosoldierError: failed to run benchmarks against primary commit: failed process: Process(`sudo -n /nanosoldier/cset/bin/cset shield -e -- sudo -n -u nanosoldier-worker -- /nanosoldier/workdir/jl_Ru6OqQ/benchscript.sh`,...

Add dereferenceable LLVM attribute to some GC functions

[Your benchmark job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/46256#issuecomment-1238592447) has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports/blob/master/benchmark/by_hash/463e6a7_vs_31d4c22/report.md).

GC mark-loop rewrite

[Your package evaluation job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45608#issuecomment-1175666844) has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/8dae1bb_vs_d6c5cb6/report.html).

GC mark-loop rewrite

[Your package evaluation job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45608#issuecomment-1176326316) has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/8dae1bb_vs_4d50ff8/report.html).

GC mark-loop rewrite

[Your benchmark job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45608#issuecomment-1178409621) has completed - possible performance regressions were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://github.com/JuliaCI/NanosoldierReports/blob/master/benchmark/by_hash/c4a5dd9_vs_51bb968/report.md).

GC mark-loop rewrite

[Your package evaluation job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45608#issuecomment-1181343881) has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/69b1856_vs_c72625f/report.html).

RFC: Don't subtype `AbstractQ <: AbstractMatrix`

[Your package evaluation job](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/46196#issuecomment-1197063224) has completed - possible new issues were detected. A full report can be found [here](https://s3.amazonaws.com/julialang-reports/nanosoldier/pkgeval/by_hash/626bc1c_vs_b2bf56e/report.html).