nf-interpreter
nf-interpreter copied to clipboard
Update fatfs to R14b
Description
Updates FatFS to the latest version
Motivation and Context
Most (if not all) platforms are already using it, (our current src repo does not take into account patches, which might be needed if we turned on ExFAT: http://elm-chan.org/fsw/ff/patches.html
How Has This Been Tested?
REQUIRES TESTING!
Screenshots
Types of changes
- [ ] Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
- [x] Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
- [x] Dev Containers (changes related with Dev Containers, has no impact on code or features)
- [x] Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
- [ ] Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)
Checklist
- [ ] My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
- [ ] My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
- [ ] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
- [ ] I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
Build seems stuck... Although I am unsure why!
Build seems stuck... Although I am unsure why!
The build is complaining about the FF configuration. That should be either a new config option or just the ID of the version which is not matching the new one.
That was reported after the "checks" sprang into life. I have now updated the configs, so we shall see what happens now 😄
@networkfusion anything pending on this one? It looks OK for merge.
No, should be good to go.