Nada Amin

Can we close this?

Oh, my question is: did you do all of them in your PR?

OK, understood. You can see the code here, if you so fancy. The template file for the livecode base is here: https://github.com/namin/io.livecode.ch/blob/master/pub/templates/base_livecode.html I don't have time to get to this...

These are the missing nodes: missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5682 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5683 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5685 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5686 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5687 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5688 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5689 missing subject ComplexPortal:CPX-5690 missing...

Just a heads-up that there were some errors on our side in reading the data. So you can feel free to ignore the list above. Things seem to be working...

@Kraks -- any thoughts on this?

I narrowed down the slowness to the `call/cc` call in `expend-tick-to-call`. I think not doing the `call/cc` call when no engines are running is a valid optimization. ``` (define expend-tick-to-call...

Some benchmarks: - An application without engines runs in **3.5** seconds. - The same application under a ChezScheme engine used as a timeout runs in **3.6** seconds. - The same...

Indeed, and here is where a nested engine causes an explicit error: https://github.com/cisco/ChezScheme/blob/main/s/engine.ss#L89

Sure, if I can make it public eventually (and I’d rather you send it publically for the scrutiny): [email protected] thanks!