DOC-1116: Google Sheets node updates

[freakwriter]

Summary of changes:

• Move troubleshooting stuff to its own "Common issues" page
• Test using a cards layout for the operations list, instead of the bullet point list

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for n8n-docs ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	50239f8741ff522e6b537a26d331cece9e499b1d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/n8n-docs/deploys/66f30100bd250c0008d3fbb6
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2485--n8n-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[github-actions[bot]]

Overall readability score: 44.18 (🟢 +0.02)

File	Readability
common-issues.md	83.05 (-)
index.md	43.9 (🔴 -17)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability 🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
common-issues.md	83.05	77.64	6	6.9	8.68	7.44
	-	-	-	-	-	-
index.md	43.9	39.84	11.55	14.1	14.09	9.09
	🔴 -17	🔴 -18.34	🔴 -2.22	🔴 -2.6	🔴 -2.16	🔴 -1.04

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	44.18	35.32	11.46	14.7	14.26	8.47
	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[freakwriter]

@nik8n I know we've both not loved the bullet point list of operations in the nodes. While I was adding a separate common issues page for Google Sheets, I played around with using a cards layout for the operations list instead.

Curious what you and @imchairmanm think--you should be able to compare this to the current Google Sheets node doc. I can flip back to the bullet point list if we don't like this, but figured I'd give you an option. :)

[imchairmanm]

@freakwriter The cards are interesting. I don't think I've gathered all of my thoughts yet, but my initial reaction is:

• I think the categories ("Document" and "Sheet Within Document") look better as subheadings than bullets
• The title + link name in the cards seem a bit repetitive to me
• I think space that cards occupy would be a better tradeoff if we could figure out a way to make the whole element act as a link instead of just the URL. Not sure how well that fits with how the card mkdoc's card component is designed though.
• Personally, I think my eyes have a bit easier time parsing items that are only arranged on one axis (vertical or horizontal), so the cards are a bit more difficult to scan for me.

All of that being said, I don't know much about the pain points you all have experienced, so feel free to disregard.

[nik8n]

Common issues looks good. In the format, I kinda like the bullet-list a little more I think. The new format takes quite a lot of space and it's hard to scan for me.

[freakwriter]

Okay good. I wasn't loving the cards either but wanted to present all the options, so I'll shift us back to the bullet point list.

[freakwriter]

Okay, cards are removed and it sounded like the other changes were okay--would one of you be able to approve?