K. N.
K. N.
Yes, getting the same error.
@codex review please, and let me know if backward compatible or not.
@sando38 Please, if you want want this PR merged, do address all the review comments.
@pat-s Appreciate it. But please let's remove microos support, otherwise let me know why you think it's needed? My understanding is that new nodes will just require leapmicro, which is...
@pat-s I merged Stani's branch into a local branch, the reason is that I want him in the commit history, as he started all this and spent a lot of...
/gemini review
@codex review please
Most importantly @pat-s , we move all of it to leapmicro, but microos nodes should keep on working, there's no reason they shouldn't work. Selinux, again we support Udica, please...
@pat-s This is a breaking change. What I'm exploring now is for v3 to actually have one network per nodepool. That will allow us to have up to 100 nodes...
@pat-s Man, subnet ranges are computed very carefully, it's a whole equilibrium. I will need to think about that one more.