'Below average amongst MPs' misleading when MP has not been in place for entire year

[MyfanwyNixon]

The office of Zac Goldsmith points out that we display that he's spoken in a 'below average' number of debates across the year amongst MPs; this is the same for all MPs who took their seat in the new parliament (but he may may be seeing it as more unfair because he's been in office previously? Not sure).

Anyway, presumably people who care can see from the context how long an MP has been in office, but I suppose one solution might be to underline the reason with a note of what proportion of the year they've actually been in place.

[ajparsons]

Think this has been addressed by removing that stats section?