Tiago Ilieve

Hi Nicolas, I see that you are trying to find a reasonable approach between signing every commit and signing only tags/releases. Although I do agree that there are reasons to...

> Maybe this python OVF library help here ? This doesn't looks to be a library, but a CLI application to deal with other kind of "OVF". Not sure if...

Hi Marcin, I was thinking about this earlier this week, asking myself about how close we are to `1.0` since `0.9.9` [was released](https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz/tree/v0.9.9). > Do you have any release plans?...

> You should definitely talk with @vorlock (Marcin Kulisz) about that, he is the current maintainer. I got a little bit confused about this... Because this issue was opened by...

> (...) my personal opinion is to tag when I have new features I know ppl want to use so sometimes it's every day (...) I like the idea of...

@andsens do you mind if I make a `0.9.10` release until we figure the version `1.0.0`? P.s.: actually I'd prefer to wait for #310 to be closed first. :-)

Anders, I forgot to ask you: do you have a GPG/PGP key? As [GitHub now supports](https://github.com/blog/2144-gpg-signature-verification) signed tags/commits verification, we can start doing this when tagging new releases (and the...

Anders, Is it okay if I tag 26d09d3 as `0.9.9-squeeze`? Because 790f2d6 already removes `squeeze` mentions from the documentation about supported builds.

Done: https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz/tree/v0.9.9-squeeze P.s.: there was a `before-wip-integration-testing-rebase` tag which was pushed together with the intended one. Should we delete it? Edit: my bad. It's obvious that you had deleted it...

There's an [ongoing discussion](https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/02/msg00036.html) about when Squeeze LTS support will really end. It maybe done at the [end of the month](https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/02/msg00044.html), but the kernel from 2.6 series had [its support...