Maximilian Knespel
Maximilian Knespel
Hm, I think this is out of scope for ratarmount, especially as an existing solution already exists, even if it hasn't seen many commits in the last 3-4 years.
> First, I would like to thank you for this amazing project. I'm actually very interested by it, and I would love to do a PR to add at least...
> ## Benchmark of libarchive-c (I got good result 🤷) > > but if needed, we could create a benchmark archive with open sourced data. I have a variety of...
I have given the libarchive backend another try in the equally named branch. It only uses simple libarchive function calls without any possibly bugged higher-level Python layers as was the...
> I think it's fine if it's not cross compatible with the tar backend. It is fine, but it should be detected. Currently, older versions would simply load an index...
Merged
> @mxmlnkn Thank you so much for your work! I thought I would have some time to actually help you on this... > > Do you think there is a...
Why is the CI green even though you report the permission error? I have no idea what could be wrong. Do you have any idea, maybe from other projects with...
> > I have now tried to redirect the shebang to dash and I have bundled a dash binary into the AppImage. Would you be so kind to check whether...
I think there has been some confusion. The patch is for fusepy, not fsspec. A corresponding open PR already exists [here](https://github.com/fusepy/fusepy/pull/142).