Michael Whelan

I would also like an inconclusive state as it is very useful when doing BDD. When I write acceptance tests in mstest or nunit then any test methods that throw...

Hi @DamianReeves. Sorry for the delay in responding and thanks for your interest in Specify. I am open to making improvements to enable different usage scenarios. I would be interested...

The driver would be the SUT and you would get one TestKit instance per instance of the driver. So, it's the creation of the SUT that you need to control...

Examples are the hardest thing for me to marry up to BDDfy. It might be that the SUT is created once per class through Specify and that we actually need...

That's right. It's currently based on class per scenario. Examples are multiple per scenario so we might have to make some changes in Specify to accommodate that.

I have now separated out the strategies for creating concrete classes in the TinyMockingContainer, which provides the behaviour required for your test to pass. The IoC container is configured to...

Hey @shaynevanasperen . Sounds like an issue with registering/resolving in the underlying container. Are you using the out of the box [Tiny container](https://github.com/grumpydev/TinyIoC) or another one, like Autofac?

I am keen to keep things as simple as possible. The intention is to just wrap the underlying IoC container or mocking framework and delegate to them because I want...

I don't think a mocking or IoC container can automatically create classes like Card, that have value types in the constructor - would it put true or false into the...

By the way, I like the health warning in [NSubstitute's docs](http://nsubstitute.github.io/help/creating-a-substitute/) where they say that you can substitute for classes, but that it has its risks and should only be...