sample-encodings icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sample-encodings copied to clipboard

Schumann_Op.41.mei

Open bwbohl opened this issue 10 years ago • 2 comments

trills are encoded in a second layer with note missing @dur. These should be encoded as trills. One might wrap them in a mei:choice though, with mei:orig and mei:reg.

bwbohl avatar Dec 16 '15 10:12 bwbohl

@bwbohl, I'm having trouble determining which trills you're talking about. Can you be more specific please?

pe-ro avatar Jan 06 '19 03:01 pe-ro

@pe-ro These are the lines from this file:

  • L1347–1385
<measure n="10" xml:id="d968622e3808">
  <staff n="1">
    <layer n="1">
      <note xml:id="d968622e3811" pname="c" oct="5" dur="4" stem.dir="down"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3827" pname="g" oct="4" dur="2" stem.dir="up"/>
      <beam>
        <note xml:id="d968622e3848" grace="unacc" pname="f" accid="s" oct="4" dur="16"
          stem.dir="up"/>
        <note xml:id="d968622e3869" grace="unacc" pname="g" oct="4" dur="16"
          stem.dir="up"/>
      </beam>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3886" pname="g" oct="4" dur="4" stem.dir="up"/>
    </layer>
    <layer n="2">
      <space xml:id="d968622e3906"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3911" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3923" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3938" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3950" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3964" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3976" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e3990" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4002" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4016" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4031" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4045" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4057" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4072" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4084" visible="false" pname="a" oct="4" stem.dir="up"
        accid.ges="f"/>
      <note xml:id="d968622e4098" visible="false" pname="g" oct="4" stem.dir="up"/>
    </layer>
  </staff>
  <!-- ... -->
</measure>

grafik

More lines like this:

  • 1787–1830
  • 2005–2033
  • 2706–2720
  • 3911–3939
  • 4668–4682
  • 8684–8698

I understand these lines to be "explorative" encoding by @KristinaRichts and @MajaHartwig from the early days of MEI. We could put them in a <choice> as @bwbohl suggests, but to me, the proper, metrically correct encoding is not entirely clear to me.

The lazy person that I am I would just delete them.

th-we avatar Oct 03 '22 08:10 th-we