Ettore Di Giacinto
Ettore Di Giacinto
I think what you need here is : meta/cos-modules. That should pull on everything else than binaries
FYI, docs: https://rancher-sandbox.github.io/cos-toolkit-docs/docs/reference/packages/meta-packages/meta-cos-modules/
> Within the current elemental it should really simple to run an installation from directory, docker image or channel to a loop device. This eventually could allow as to build...
> Sounds awfully similar to [rancher-sandbox/os2#6](https://github.com/rancher-sandbox/os2/issues/6) thinking wink note that https://github.com/rancher-sandbox/os2/issues/6 can be already achieved with the current cOS featureset, it is mostly about tying it the os2 configuration
Hi @j-landru altough not directly supported, it should be still possible building ISOS with syslinux, see https://github.com/Luet-lab/luet-makeiso/pull/4#issuecomment-1072644198 for an example. But besides that it wouldn't explain such a growth of...
A general `/etc/cos/config` has been introduced in #517
huh.. maybe time to set up staging repo to run tests ?
Docs would need to be updated to match the path changes too, for example here: https://github.com/rancher-sandbox/cos-toolkit-docs/blob/a56575b61580dc1f1830bb38382a7eb5203948fc/content/en/docs/Examples/embedded_images.md#L142
While I do agree that cosign should be more than enough, this is actually something that bubbled up as a discussion recently, and a feature we have been asked for...
> I am also in favor of dropping mtree support, I see little gain on it and something we, and probably everyone else, is likely to end up skipping or...