Explicit reveals for jinja city grid

[NBKelly]

Right now I've solved the "runner abilities don't appear to work" issue by having the dropdowns drop "down" when the ability belongs to a card in the 'corp-top-opponent' area.

The exact offset number (115%) can probably be tweaked for best aesthetics, I don't really have a good eye for that.

For now, Closes #6663.

Next up will be

1. implementing the ability for jinja
2. maybe implementing it for corporate defector as well

[NBKelly]

So as far as I can tell, this works.

• There's a runner-ability on Jinja City Grid which allows the runner to say yes/no to explicit reveals
• The value they choose is propagated across all active copies of Jinja city grid (no need to click another one if you happen to trash the one you chose)
• it gets copied to a newly rezzed Jinja city grid

What it does:

• If the runner says yes, then you get a little box popping up forcing you to read the cardname whenever the corporation reveals a card

Why:

• The physical act of revealing/showing a card is a big part of functional memory. Hiding that in a chat log, which is usually overwhelmed with information, strongly effects the power level of these cards (in my opinion).

Getting the runner prompt to not interact with the corp prompt/ability requires a little bit of an ugly hack. If there's a better way to do it, I would be happy to change it.

• It can't complete the eid because that ruins things on the corp side
• Making the prompt async and deliberately failing to complete the eid appears to work

[NoahTheDuke]

Still says WIP, so any updates on this?

[NBKelly]

oh, this is fully functional, it's more a question of is that ugly hack I did going to cause any damage/other side-effects?

If no, then this is perfectly good to go.

[NoahTheDuke]

Okay, I never replied or merged this but I think that it's viable. I wonder if we could generalize this, maybe put it into reveal? That way we don't have to mess with eids.

[NoahTheDuke]

lmao i can't seem to merge this. you have commit power so you know what? merge at your pleasure. i trust you to get it right.

[NBKelly]

I think I'm going to shelve this in favor of writing a direct 'explicit-reveal layer that just plugs into our reveal interface and uses a setting in the side pane.