MTG
Ok. Then, let us keep the certificates and change the assertion in the test to have an explicit test for this behaviour (or simply close this PR). I will commit...
> I agree that an additional lint is warranted here. I believe this will close #795 as well. Thanks for tackling that, @mtgag Should I incorporate lint_single_email_if_present (and then delete...
> My suggestion would be the latter. I will open a new PR for this. Then we have a stable pre-review and pre-merge state in lint_single_email_if_present addressing https://github.com/zmap/zlint/issues/795. We can...
@jdkasten and @cardonator is the discussion in this issue covered by PR #808? If yes, this issue could be closed.
There is a port of zlint in Java, called jzlint. See: https://github.com/MTG-AG/jzlint. Not all zlint lints are yet implemented. Also some additional lints exist starting to cover other specifications (see...
Maybe the best way to start on this would be to create a few pull requests. @christopher-henderson would this work for you?
List of pull requests: - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/711 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/717 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/722 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/723 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/724 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/731 - [x] https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/732 List of issues: - [x]...
It's been a bit quiet around jzlint lately and I think we can close this. If things come up through the use of jzlint that are worth reporting, we will...
> Hello! > > My first observation is that this PR includes quite a bit of code that is not really needed for the specific lint proposed. I am referring...
> I've been thinking about this lint a bit more and have one more point to make, in addition to what I said above. Let me be clear that this...