Marius Tennøe

This is a great idea! Would definitely add an extra layer of protection. Some things we should ensure (imo): * It needs to be optional in case consumers don't want...

This code-generator currently only supports Swagger 2.0 right now, so we need to look at the spec for 2.0 [here](https://swagger.io/docs/specification/2-0/basic-structure/) instead. Interestingly enough dates are not mentioned explicitly for 2.0,...

Thanks! Backwards compatibility is important so we could consider a solution that exposes a union type for dates, where the type would be `Date | string`, and then we could...

Cool! Not sure when a solution can be looked into though (my bandwidth is sadly filled at the moment), but anyone should be able to give it a shot :)

We could consider doing the string union as a backwards compatible stop-gap solution, and then remove the `| string` part when going to the next major version