Marius Tennøe

Agree, some cleanup is recommended before starting this work (not just for this specific proposal, but for the others as well). Re. tree shaking: I really recommend looking into it...

Another +1 from me! It probably makes sense to create some guidelines before starting the other proposals/cleanups, as we then can move towards that goal from the start

Would love to do it. Based on current bandwidth due to work elsewhere I am not sure when I would have time to do it though, so I don't want...

No changelogs sadly and the only proper documentation is in the readme. It's definitely something that has to be improved all up. The [merge commit messages](https://github.com/mtennoe/swagger-typescript-codegen/commits/master) _should_ be fairly descriptive...

All good points! I like the idea of supporting multiple request libraries. It will as you write introduce some complexity ofc, but might be worth it. A middle ground could...

Agree, with the right level of abstractions it might turn out pretty nice. However, there will always be some complexity when adding abstractions, but in this case it might be...

Yo! Yep, seems like we are missing this. Shouldnt be too hard to add either, so should be an easy win. Might also be interesting to make it togglable so...

+1 on this! My expectation in my projects as well. I think to support backwardscompatibility we should make it an opt-in feature. A bit of a side track - this...

Like it, sounds like a reasonable approach (and what many other projects do)

Hi @max-scopp! Seems like you closed this issue. I guess it is still relevant? Were you able to get the environment running? If not, what kind of type errors are...