Marcel Stimberg

Right, I did not actually think about the "quantity" dimension, I agree that photon would rather be like moles instead of dimensionless. The main problem still remains, though: Brian's unit...

I agree to the point about not repeating info. I'm still a bit torn between having something Python-like and something that looks as mathematical as possible. A quite drastic solution...

I wouldn't put function definitions into equations, I think this would lead users even more to think that they can write arbitrary Python code there (in particular use `[...]` indexing,...

I have to think a bit more about this, but I just noticed that your latest proposal actually is actually option 3 (Python's ternary operator) with added curly braces and...

I was about to start working on this, but now I have second thoughts whether allowing two `Synapses` objects to have summed variables for the same post-synaptic variable is a...

Looking into some old issues, I realized that this is actually a special-case of #126, i.e. if we had a general check that a variable is set twice without being...

> How about g_post = g_syn+h_syn : 1 (summed) if you want to have two? I don't quite understand what you mean by that, I'm afraid... > As long as...

Ah, no, you can already do that. The thing is that people want to use two `Synapses` objects for some reason, something like this: ```Python type1_synapses = Synapses(sources, targets, '''dg_syn/dt...

Yes, this is what I am currently doing. The problem is that there is no way to detect this from within the `Synapses`/`SummedVariableUpdater` code, so I have to add a...

Sorry, copy&paste error, it was supposed to be `g_post` in both cases. I'd say explicit subgroups are ok, because we can check it in Python code. I think we should...