mstanton1
mstanton1
Clarified during stand-up. Effort was for attempt at reproducing. @chdivyareddy commented above about challenges with reproducing and the attempts made. This should be handled by the UI and API tickets...
@LizGovier can you please add a mock-up showing where the certified search checkbox will appear on the review screen, and how it should appear in the payment modal when a...
@tlebedovich when we gathered payment requirements we were advised that a client could request their search from staff on a priority basis. No other filings have a priority option though...
Darn. I can create one now. Is this something that might take a while. Any chance getting this before you're on holiday or do you think we should pull the...
@forgeuxGH5 @cameron-eyds thank you! I've created the UI Design ticket and linked it. Given the report change is very much in line with PPR I will keep that in this...
Thanks @LizGovier @forgeuxGH5 for the recent review. I verified the watermark and that TEST doesn't appear in the footer.
An MHR Cover letter has been created under #16607. This will be attached to registrations completed by staff only as part of the PDF. For manufacturer registrations a daily email...
@tlebedovich I've received confirmation that the order for display of a legal land description does not actually align with our component in the UI. Keep input form screen order as...
@ChasBoucher from my read of this ticket and notes it is focused on implementing the Canada Post address lookup. Can you confirm if that is already in place? If so...
Moving to closed based upon the comment above.