Matt Marshall

Closing because as of 3.0, each object has an `attributes` array which can be used to include taxonomy_terms.

I'm closing this as out of scope for issues on the specification repo, I think it's an important discussion but probably one more suited to a thread over at https://forum.openreferral.org/...

Closed. See #208, we can attach taxonomies and attributes to most objects/schemas now :-)

Closing as we do this now, as of 3.0 :-)

Closing as both taxonomy and taxonomy_term schemas have a desciption fielda s of 3.0

Closing since we've addressed this in 3.0. We have clearly marked Required fields on the schema reference page, and we also have a robust Profiles mechanism which serves marking other...

I'm closing this as I believe that 3.0's [language schema](http://docs.openreferral.org/en/latest/hsds/schema_reference.html#language) meets this need.

I am closing this because I believe that HSDS has moved on in its modelling and the discussion no longer is directly relevant to 3.0 and beyond. Please reopen if...

I am provisionally closing this as I cannot find reference to the term transit in HSDS 3.0, in either the documentation or the schema files. To me this indicates that...

Closing this as we no longer have eligibility modelled in this way. However I'm noting that there's been several other issues discussing how enums in the standard are not rendered...