Mark Karpov

If the comment originally pertained to a set of extensions, then it seems like a mistake to only mention it for one of the extensions. I think the current behavior...

The problem here is that there could be also a long comment about the pragmas and we have no way to tell whether it is the case or not. Typically...

I think we should try to shift the infix operator one indentation step to the left in this particular case. As the last resort we could also shift half-step, but...

The desired output for the example provided by the OP: ```haskell y = do _

@tbagrel1 For that one, let's go with the option 1. I think the lesser evil here is to have all operators equally "half-indented". Regarding your question about `:`: ```haskell x...

Good question. It's hard to tell :-D Seriously though, It looks like `(:)` will be applied to the whole do block. And yes, that's what I had in mind. Simply...

Can we have this rule: if at least one operand in an operator chain is a do block, then do this: ```haskell x = 1 : do blah blah :...

I suppose you're talking about [`withResponseHistory`](http://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-client-0.6.4.1/docs/Network-HTTP-Client.html#v:withResponseHistory). Indeed, there is nothing like that in Req. I lack time to work on this.

Note that the current version of the library works a bit differently. You still should be able to use `req'`, see how `pure-tests` is written.

Does `http-client` support `file` scheme?