Slava Egorov

> In particular, how would this syntax deal with anything that involves a separator and dynamic content? There is no reason to worry about separators because you are building it...

> how would you be able to, from those inputs, have code blocks that generate the following? Something along the lines of: ```dart Declaration fnClass(FunctionDeclaration fn) { final name =...

@tatumizer It would looks something like this with QQ as I imagine it: ```dart class Foo { -{(){ var list=[2]; for (int i=3; list.length Currently it sounds like @mraleph is...

@tatumizer > @mraleph: do you agree that comptime/emit notation is more readable? It's basically the same thing in my eyes. There is a bit of noise around immediate invoked anonymous...

I think I have managed to conflate a lot of topics into a single issue due to the complicated nature of the topic. Lets try to split it out a...

If there are existing examples using string based code APIs - I would be happy to port some to QQ myself.

I think we should consider splitting this into its own feature, I suggest to look at this as an _interface auto derivation_ feature which works for structs and classes alike,...

> I like this feature, but I'm not sure it gets you where you want in terms of brevity. Compare: For `data class` specifically we just declare that it implicitly...

Do we actually have to support getters? Maybe we could limit ourselves to destructurring only "primitive" properties: meaning it _must_ to be a field. We can't guarantee this now within...

When talking about optimizations it's more polymorphism of each individual operation inside the function is more relevant than polymorphism of the function (that's why my blog post always talks about...